.png)
.jpeg)
The structure of employment contracts is undergoing a seismic shift with the recent move by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to ban non-compete clauses. This landmark decision has the potential to reshape how businesses protect their interests and manage their workforce. In a recent episode of The Chartwell Chronicles podcast, Chartwell Law Partner, Graham Newsome, discussed the implications of this new rule, which could put an end to non-compete agreements as we know them.
As Graham explained, the FTC's new rule, set to take effect on September 4, 2024, will prohibit employers from entering into or attempting to enforce non-compete clauses with employees and independent contractors. Non-compete agreements, which typically restrict workers from joining competitors or starting similar businesses within a certain timeframe and geographic area, have long been a controversial topic in employment law.
While some states have already placed limitations on the enforceability of non-compete clauses, the FTC's rule would create a federal standard, effectively nullifying non-competes across the country, with a few notable exceptions. These exceptions include senior executives and certain situations involving the sale of a business, where non-competes may still be permitted.
Non-compete agreements have long been a staple of employment contracts, especially in industries where businesses seek to protect trade secrets, client lists, and other proprietary information. However, these agreements have also been criticized for limiting employees' ability to seek better opportunities and stifling competition in the labor market.
The FTC's rule is rooted in the belief that non-compete clauses harm workers by restricting their job mobility and suppressing wages. By banning these agreements, the FTC aims to create a more dynamic and competitive job market, allowing workers to move freely between employers and contribute to a more robust economy.
Despite the FTC's bold move, the rule is not without its challenges. As Graham highlighted, there have already been lawsuits filed against the FTC, questioning the agency's authority to implement such a sweeping change. One case in Texas, Ryan LLC v. FTC, resulted in a limited stay of the rule. This injunction, however, was restricted to the named and intervenor plaintiffs in that specific action, meaning that for most employers, the Final Rule is still set to take effect on September 4, 2024. In contrast, another case in Pennsylvania, ATS Tree Services, LLC v. The Federal Trade Commission, resulted in the court denying the request for an injunction on July 23, 2024.
Complicating matters further is the recent Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which eliminated the longstanding Chevron deference. This legal doctrine previously required federal courts to defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous statutes. Without Chevron deference, courts now have greater latitude to scrutinize agency actions, such as the FTC's Final Rule banning non-compete agreements.
The decisions in Ryan, LLC and ATS Tree Services, LLC will likely influence how the Supreme Court evaluates the FTC's authority to implement such a broad rule. As these cases move through the appellate process, it remains uncertain how quickly the Supreme Court will take up the matter. However, given the current legal landscape and upcoming election, it is plausible that we could see a scenario where the Final Rule takes effect in certain states while other states continue to challenge its validity in court.
As the legal battles unfold, employers should prepare for a future where non-compete agreements are no longer a viable option for protecting their business interests. This means revisiting employment contracts, exploring alternative ways to safeguard proprietary information, and staying informed about the latest developments in this rapidly evolving area of law.
For more insights on how the FTC's rule and other employment law trends could impact your business, be sure to subscribe to The Chartwell Chronicles podcast and follow Chartwell Law for updates and analysis.
